For the online right, Charlie Kirk's "martyrdom" is just trollin',
But that's not true for New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan.
He offered the opinion, which was sure to appall,
That Kirk was a latter day Saint Paul.
"A missionary," the Cardinal called him, "an evangelist, a hero."
To Dolan, Kirk's incendiary rhetoric meant zero.
Jesus was referring to Kirk when he said: "The truth shall set you free?"
Did Dolan ever read the scriptures? I mean, really?
The Cardinal wants to make Charlie Kirk out a saint?
All he's doing is giving Catholicism a terrible taint!
Stochastic violence is the right's worst vice,
Definitively putting Charlie Kirk on the wrong side of Christ.
His supporters say Charlie Kirk is a class act,
But he traffics in large scale deployment of ass facts.
Kirk can swear whites are targeted until his face turns blue,
But anybody in touch with reality knows this just isn't true.
Among Evangelicals, his goal is to stoke racial fear
In order to bring the white nationalist race war near.
Fans say taken in context, his remarks are innocent, but let's face it:
There is no context in which remarks like this aren't racist.
Fuelling racial tension may not be becoming of a saint,
But Charlie Kirk's rhetoric reeks of this taint!
His fondness for attacking enemies came at a great price:
Charlie was so often on the wrong side of Christ.
Jesus' message was one of compassion,
But for Evangelical Christians, that is no longer in fashion.
They love to wax eloquently rhetorical
About how trans people are utterly abhorical.
You'd think with helping the weakest, Evangelicals would have a lot on their plate,
But there seems to be plenty of room in these Christians' hearts for hate.
They believe the weakest in society deserve persecution:
For early Christians, they appear to be a modern substitution.
Transphobia won't stop MAGA from labelling you a saint -
They've made a calculation and will brook no complaint!
He was quick to give women the worst advice,
Which put Charlie Kirk on the wrong side of Christ.
Kirk's views on women are right out of the 1950s playbook;
In the modern context, they're nothing but gobbledygook.
To male power fantasies his rhetoric caters,
Reducing women to nothing but baby incubators.
To make his misogynist views even more crappy,
He claimed that they would make women truly happy.
Jesus, on the other hand, would look upon these views with misery:
He wanted women to play an equal role in his ministry.
His fans try to portray him as some kind of saint,
But trust me, Friend, Charlie Kirk ain't!
For power, Charlie Kirk had a great avarice,
Which assuredly put him on the wrong side of Christ
Kirk spoke, with a singular lack of maturity,
Of maintaining white racial purity.
In the United States, a land of plenty,
He argued for white racial hegemony.
(If he ever encountered indigenous folks, Kirk should have been red-faced;
Historically, it was them whites tried to replace!)
Kirk could talk all he wanted to, to rant and rant and rant,
But his views were at odds with those of Jesus on the issue of the immigrant.
Are Evangelicals certain they want to portray Kirk as a saint?
Because from Jesus' teachings, he is quite deviant!
Acknowledging his religion's roots would be nice;
Hacking away at them puts Charlie Kirk on the wrong side of Christ.
Kirk's position, which can only be described as surreal,
Is hating Jews while embracing the state of Israel.
He must know, not being a religious naif,
That Jesus and his disciples all followed the Jewish faith.
But here he is, saying Jews are at the head of a Commie cabal
The banks, the media, American immigration policy; we control it all.
The Orthodox are okay in Kirk's view,
But you think his followers care about the difference between them and secular Jews?
Does a racist past make for a present day saint?
For that kind of whitewash, there ain't enough paint!
